5 Google Image Searches of Separation

August 31st, 2011
Search google with this image

With all the hype around Google+ it’s easy to forget the company built its fortune on becoming the world’s most popular search engine.

Google hasn’t.

It has recently rolled out ‘search by image’ functionality and we’re impressed, and thought we’d learn a little bit more by experimenting.

Starting with my own side-on profile I thought I’d see just how many Brad Pitts are returned in the SERPs, not much luck; just 50-something balding men, anyway as an interesting way to test out the new feature I thought I’d try 5 google searches of separation and try to get as far away as possible from the initial image. I’d like to invite you all give it a go and first prize goes to anyone who gets a Bradley Cooper or a Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in their ‘visually similar’ results

The aim is to get as far away as possible from the your original image as possible.

1) Enable search by google image

2) Right click your image on the internet somewhere select ‘search google with this image’

3) Select ‘visually similar images’ and find whichever image you believe is furthest from the original

4) Repeat four more times to get a funny image (if possible)

My best effort using my Team page image led me, via a number of surprising results that are either understandable or utterly unfathomable, to this ‘similar’ image.

Interestingly the results pages tended to display the same results time and time again (I know it’s ‘visually similar’ so you might expect to see this but i’m choosing the extreme cases every time). It appears to be very rudimentary but could prove to be useful if your chasing a copyright free image to use on your website, or simply if you have some time on your hands and fancy a vanity face search!

Going Round In Circles

July 28th, 2011
Screen shot 2011-07-19 at 18.30.23

Google+’s system of sharing information is a refined (if not quite intuitive) and intelligent application of something we’ve been doing here at Democracy PR for some time: sharing the right information with the right people.

Whereas Facebook’s privacy settings are lax by default and continue to be until you adjust the settings, Google’s model of sharing permits us, encourages even, to share with the right people. Placing people into your private circles (no one but you is aware of which circle you put them into) allows you to define separate groups with whom you can share content. You may have circles for colleagues and friends (depending on how happy you are at work there may well be some crossover here!) or groups for distinct people; The boss, The wife and the kids maybe?

Share and Share a ‘Like’

Now, as an agency with real strength in social media we’re unsurprisingly well-versed in sharing carefully online. We’re all huge advocates of twitter in the office but unless we create two profiles, or more, it’s difficult to find one voice to manage all your followers. We introduced a hashtag, #dpr, to differentiate work and industry related tweets from all other stuff, be it reality t.v., rants about public transport or poor customer service, and nights out. While it doesn’t remedy the difficulties of managing a mix of followers it’s certainly a smarter way to manage the content on our twitter feed on the website.

The web is littered with stories of employees who have tweeted inappropriate messages due to a mix up between personal and professional profiles. Just as when a Red Cross social media specialist tweeted about getting drunk from the Red Cross account and the tweet exploded. Searching for the Red Cross Twitter account? You’ll likely see the negative story just as quickly as the twitter account on a Google search results page. To avoid any such confusion I am very careful about linking client accounts and my personal accounts to the same twitter client. I have opted to use twitter’s very own android app to manage clients and Hootsuite for my own tweeting!

Billy No-Mates

Facebook is similar and potentially more problematic. Using the platform as we do in several guises for various clients it would be difficult to use our normal public profiles to manage various profesional brand pages, instead we create separate professional identities to manage them. I masquerade online as a professional billy no-mates, but one that has still got his job.

That Google+ immediately solves these issues is a huge boon and furthermore demonstrates that the search giant has privacy at its core; or as a cynic might claim, realises that privacy is the key to users and therefore revenue. I’ve been trialling circles for over three weeks now and i’m really taken by the service and enthusiastic about the introduction of business accounts.

Google knows if you’ve been naughty or nice

December 8th, 2010
santa-naughty-list

They see you when you’re tweeting, they know when you’re on brand, *ahem*, that’s quite enough of that.

Yesterday, google amended its algorithm to take into account the sentiment of your online chatter, after an article in a US newspaper published a story about a brand using negative reviews to boost their google ranking.

Any sensible marketer will already have been working under the assumption that when talking about your brand online, it’s important to manage and respond to negative messages or these can quickly undermine any positive messages being put out by a brand.

If the first thing a potential customer finds about you online is negative, that’s going to colour their future opinions of your brand. With some companies becoming obsessed with search ranking, a high volume of negative reviews can be a badly thought through shortcut to search heaven.

If it was ever the case offline, this latest move by google proves that online, not all publicity is good publicity.

The future of search

March 28th, 2008

Just got my beta invite through for Searchme. Wow!

Rather than giving you the usual text-only results, Searchme shows a snapshot of the page it’s found – making it easier for you to tell if it matches your requirements.

Moving between the snapshots is akin to using Apple’s Coverflow, as found in iTunes and it’s OS X Leopard operating system. That is to say, a breeze.

search-me-man.png Right now the database is relatively small; one billion pages as opposed to, say, Google’s 12 billion or so. But everybody has to start somewhere and the pages it stores will only grow over time.

The developers are swift to ensure we users know it’s a beta – and a real beta at that (not like GMail which has been in beta for 2 or 3 years and shows no signs of ever leaving).

I like the honesty: “our thing isn’t perfect, could you help us make it better please” is essentially what they’re saying. It means I’m helping to iron out the bugs, testing their web-based software against my own particular set-up and offering tips on how the next version can be even better.

Google has become the de facto search engine for most people and, as with Hoover, its name is in danger of passing from noun to verb. Whilst that might sound appealing, it has serious trademark issues – as any journalist who’s ever written Portakabin, Xerox or Kleenex when they meant “temporary, portable building”, “photocopy” or “tissue” will attest – but that doesn’t stop people doing it.

You say “I googled it”, not “I searched for it”. And when we say we ‘googled’ we don’t always mean we used Google. Or, at least, I don’t.

Is it even the best search engine any more? To answer that, we have to define ‘best’. Most results? Google probably wins on that score – but who wants to search through pages of chaff to find the one or two pages that are relevant to their precise needs.

Searchme may not be the best search engine yet – in terms of “finding the results I want for this particular search” – but their visual interface certainly makes their chances of succeeding, and toppling Google off its lofty perch, better than most

Can PR boost your Google rankings?

February 25th, 2008

Search engine optomisation, or ‘getting your website to rank highly on the major search engines’, is considered by many to be a dark art.

Mainly because there is no definitive solution to getting it right. The algorithms applied by search engines change daily and the best advice any digital chap can offer is that your presence on the first page of Google is an ongoing labour of love – so when you build a site, you need to keep tinkering with it to keep up your rank.

After the initial build of the site, there are lots of ways to boost your rating. Deep linking between yourself and other high traffic sites can really push you up there but this often gives nothing beneficial to your public and still costs you.

So can public relations square the circle? Great links + great content?

We believe that it can and it should.

Blog posts and press releases can be optomised in a way that the computer can understand, using meaningful keywords with the right frequency so that the search engines and news sites can find you.

More than that, these words pull your public towards you, rather than pushing your messages onto them. Delivering a public receptive to what you want to tell them.

Every stage of this can be tracked, monitored and evaluated. Demonstrating how ‘fluffy’ PR can become 100 per cent accountable.